Romania Sociala logo
Menu

Facing a New “Age of Migration”? Methodological Challenges, Conceptual Questions, Political Entanglements ESA RN 35 “Sociology of Migration” – Midterm Conference

autor:   31 March 2016  

1–2 September 2016 Bucharest

Organizers: ESA RN 35 “Sociology of Migration”,

Research Institute for Quality of Life, Romanian Academy

Faculty of Sociology and Social Work, University of Bucharest

Keynote: Prof. Bridget Anderson, Professor of Migration and Citizenship, and Research Director of COMPAS

In the midst of intense public debates and political discussions on migration, ESA Research Network 35 “Sociology of Migration” announces its third mid-term conference, to be held from 1 to 2 September 2016 in Bucharest.

The main theme of the Conference will be to reflect on the question of whether or not European countries are currently facing a “new” age of migration and on the methodological and conceptual challenges posed to migration research within the current developments. Thematically, this conference will bring together various analytical and methodological approaches in refugee and migration studies.

Studies on the refugee question, on extremism and racism as well as studies involving longitudinal and/or comparative analyses focusing on the European context are particularly welcome, as are papers which analyse everyday practices and strategies of action and resistance of refugees and migrants and their families. We particularly invite papers that reflect upon, as well as examinations of the complex political entanglements of migration scholarship.

Our aim is to provide a platform for those who have already met at earlier conferences to continue our discussions, and to invite other scholars to join us in this endeavour. This conference will have a strong focus on dialogue. Hence, papers that draw links to and/or reflect upon their relation to ongoing scholarly and public debates will be given priority.

Our midterm conference will cover the following issue areas:

  1. Sociological diagnoses of the current situation – from political discourses to migrant agency: We welcome papers that present contemporary studies focussing on the refugee “crisis” including the perception of refugees and migrants, consequences of shifting policies, racism and social change in Europe, effects on migrants’ lives and practices and linkages between extremisms, success of far-right wing parties and Islamist tendencies to migration. We specifically invite papers that draw links between different conceptual fields, for example by ‘evaluating’ policies from below: How are migrant’s affected by the intensification of the current political and public debates?
  1. Methodological challenges – from epistemological debate to travelling methodologies: Methodologically, the field migration studies is broad and very diverse. We encourage submissions of methodological papers that reflect on the implications of different epistemological perspectives and the concrete pros and cons of specific methodological approaches. Among others, we are interested in evaluations of current challenges for quantitative migration research. How can, e.g., administrative data be used for academic purposes? How do we evaluate their quality and the ways in which they are used? What can researchers in the European context learn from methodologies that have been developed and applied in other settings?
  1. Theoretical legacies and blind spots – from methodological nationalism to receiving country bias: In the face of current developments, migration research needs to discuss its conceptual and analytical toolkit. How do our forms of construing, problematizing and researching migration relate to orders of mobility, power, and inequality? Have we managed to overcome methodological nationalism? Or are our accounts still structured by dominant political notions and problem understandings – e.g. in what de Haas has called a receiving country bias in migration research?
  1. Sociological self-reflection: One of the pressing conundrums that migration researchers are faced with is: How can sociologists become or remain relevant without becoming part of the very system they criticise? We particularly invite papers that combine self-reflexive and critical accounts of past and ongoing research with suggestions for future scholarly activity.

The deadline for submission of abstracts (max. 200 words) and brief biographical notes is March 1st 2016. Please send your documents to karin.peters@wur.nl. Decisions will be communicated by March 21 2016.

Organisation:

No fees will be charged, but you will need to pay for your own travel and accommodation. Information on hotels and hostels close to the conference venue will be communicated to all participants in due course.

 



Facebook

Prof.Univ.Dr.Emerit, Eugen BLAGA: “Cel din urmă genial. Gheorghe Zamfir”, Editura Europrint

Cu puțin timp înainte de marele concert din Piața Constituției (21 septembrie), unul din cele mai mari concerte ale artistului din toate timpurile, am reușit, după mai multe luni, să finalizez cea mai recentă carte a noastră. (Eugen, Blaga „ Cel din urmă genial. Gheorghe Zamfir”, Editura Europrint, Oradea, 2018, ...

Despre capitalism, numai de bine. Fragmentul III: Marea Criză 1929-1933

Pentru a putea finanţa cheltuielile din primul război mondial, statele beligerante, cu excepţia SUA care a intrat în război abia în 1917, şi-au multiplicat nesustenabil cantitatea de bani de hârtie. Cu toate acestea, guvernele acestor state, cu excepţia Rusiei, au menţinut şi după terminarea războiului parităţile în aur ale banilor ...

Despre capitalism, numai de bine. Fragmentul IV: URSS şi Acordul de la Bretton Woods

Apariţia URSS în 1922 a constituit o enormă provocare şi un enorm pericol pentru capitalism. Din următoarele motive: suprafaţa sa enormă (22,4 milioane de km2), resursele umane (260 de milioane de locuitori), imensele sale resurse naturale, uriaşul său potenţial economic, dar mai ales regimul său politic marxist-leninist. Pentru prima oară ...

Un orb dus de mână, de cine și unde

Azi noapte am avut un coșmar. Era un orb dus de cineva de mână. Îi spunea orbului că îl duce înainte, dar căile păreau încurcate și ai impresia chiar că îl duce înapoi. M-am uitat mai atent. Cine e  orbul? Am înțeles: România. Dar cine îl duce de mână?  Nu ...

Evolution and Transcendence – Gambling our Path to Deity

As you walk into your local supermarket, you see a line of angry people rioting in the parking lot. They are carrying signs that read “I am not a science experiment” or “say no to frankenfoods,” and they ask you to sign a petition against GMOs. As you recall, the fight ...

Elogiu plictiselii Eseuri psihosociologice

Suceava, Editura Alexandria Pubishing House, 2018 (243 p.) Profesorul Septimiu Chelcea revine în atenția publicului cu o lectură care surpinde încă din titlu. Elogiu plictiselii este botezul unei cărți serioase în care este propusă o autopsiere a gândirii de masă cu efecte asupra individului. Diagnosticul arată cât de slabi suntem în ...

„Protestul diasporei”: o haltă pe drumul destatalizării României

"Ceea ce s-a numit "Protestul diasporei", acum realizăm că mai degrabă impropriu, a fost un eveniment ciudat din multe puncte de vedere. El a șocat opinia publică și a stârnit controverse. Textul lui Adrian Severin oferă un punct de vedere. Cu siguranța sunt si alte opinii. Le vom includem cu interes." ...

Despre capitalism, numai de bine. Fragmentul II: Sistemul bancar global: de la Banca Angliei la Fed

Este absolut evident că punctul slab al acelui capitalism arhetipal îl constituia sistemul bancar, care nu avea suficiente resurse pentru creditarea investiţiilor, a producţiei şi a consumului de bunuri. De regulă, patronii de manufacturi din acea perioadă îşi finanţau din resurse proprii achiziţionarea utilajelor, a materiilor prime şi plata salariilor. ...